Name
Glossary on innovation using technological tools
Topic
Teaching innovation
Learning time
3 hours
Designed time
5 hours and 10 minutes
Size of class
15
Description
This lesson plan is designed in the context of a Master of Teaching in Secondary, and most specifically in the subject of "Teaching innovation". It' describes a collaborative activity to create a joint glossary of terms related with teaching innovation, using digital artifacts. The students divide in three groups: informaticians (who research the tools and select the one which fit best each individual researcher needs), researchers (who research the terms and create the digital artifact), and inspectors (who will survey the work dynamics within and among the groups)
Aims
- to understand some typical vocabulary related with teaching innovation - to get to know some tools for creation - to promote collaborative learning
Outcomes
Define, Select, Derive, Combine
Editor
mnapalf
Edit
Researchers: Search information on the term selected from the list.
130 minutes)
  • Collaborate
    10
    10
    1
    Distribute the terms from the list among the researchers
  • Investigate
    60
    10
    0
    Individually, investigate the allocated term
  • Produce
    60
    0
    Create a digital artifact (video, animation, infography, timeline...) which explains shortly the allocated term.
Notes:
Runs in parallel with TLA 2 and 3 Evaluation: Peer-evaluation researchers by inspectors: rubric1 Self-evaluation of researchers: checklist1
Resources linked: 1
Informaticians: Review the suggested tools, investigate them and make an account of strong and weak points, and usability. After giving advice to researchers on the tools which best suit their needs, collect all the created artifacts and socialize them.
150 minutes)
  • Collaborate
    5
    3
    1
    Distribute the applications of the list
  • Investigate
    40
    3
    0
    Individually or in group, review the suggested applications
  • Discuss
    25
    3
    0
    Produce and argumented acount of weaknessess, strong points and usability of each tool, with reccommendations for use
  • Collaborate
    60
    13
    0
    Researchers meet individually informaticians, which advice them about the tool that best suits their needings, and which best adapts to the digital artifact they've planned. Counseling goes on for the length of the artifact creation period.
  • Produce
    20
    3
    0
    Collect all the created artifacts in a collaborative. shareable wall, where all the students in the class can learn about the meaning of the launched tems.
Notes:
Runs in parallel with TLA 1 and 3 Evaluation: Peer-evaluation technicians by inspectors: rubric2 Self-evaluation of technicians: checklist2
Resources linked: 1
Inspectors: For the length of the activity, inspectors watch out the interactions within (decission making, constructing justified prelations), and between (counseling) groups. At the end they share their observations
0 minutes)
  • Practice
    0
    Using the provided rubrics, inspectors review: - interaction within/ among groups. - strenght of the collaboration. - evidences of individual learning strategies.
Notes:
Runs in parallell with TLA 1 and 2 Evaluation: Self-evaluation of inspectors: checklist3
Resources linked: 1
All the class: comment on the launched terms.
30 minutes)
  • Discuss
    30
    0
    Evaluate them in relation with the theoretical framework previously developed in the subject
Notes:
Runs after TLA 1,2 and 3 have finished.
Resources linked: 0

Learning Experience

One or more graphs might not display correctly, because one or more learning types do not have duration set.
Social learning graph will not display correctly, because no class size is set.
Social learning graph will not display correctly, because one or more learning types do not have group size set.