Science & technology | Clinical trials

Better with bitcoin

Blockchain technology could improve the reliability of medical trials

CLINICAL trials are a murky old world. The pharmaceutical industry is keen to get new drugs to market and researchers are just as keen to report positive results. This can produce some rather unpleasant side-effects. Selective reporting of data from trials is rife. In one infamous example, a 2001 study reported that paroxetine, an antidepressant, was safe and effective for treating the illness in teenagers. It later emerged, however, that this was based on new measures of the drug’s effectiveness, introduced only after the drug had failed to show any significant improvement in the outcomes that had been specified when the trial was first drawn up. Later studies showed that the drug increased the risk of suicidal behaviour in children.

How to guard against such things got Greg Irving, a family doctor and a researcher at the University of Cambridge, thinking. He came up with a way to improve the reporting of clinical trials with the blockchain technology underlying bitcoin, a digital currency. The blockchain is a database that acts as a public ledger of all transactions with the currency, and is thought to be almost completely tamper-proof because it is validated and stored independently on thousands of different computers worldwide. This provides a way, Dr Irving reckons, to check that results have not been fudged.

This article appeared in the Science & technology section of the print edition under the headline "Better with bitcoin"

When the drugs don’t work: The rise of antibiotic resistance

From the May 21st 2016 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Science & technology

Many mental-health conditions have bodily triggers

Psychiatrists are at long last starting to connect the dots

Climate change is slowing Earth’s rotation

This simplifies things for the world’s timekeepers


Memorable images make time pass more slowly

The effect could give our brains longer to process information